top of page

Function of Working Groups

Are you confused about what the role of a Working Group is, and how they function? Download this 3 page FAQ for more information.

Why have Working Groups?

Our UPR workgroups are organized by issue/topic. This allows maximum participation of members in the UPR process, while assuring that the UN does not receive duplicates of information on a particular issue/theme. It allows us to provide a united effort to lobby for our particular issue area. It is a vehicle for the sharing of information that may be of interest/assistance to others in our workgroups.

How does a Working Group operate?

One of the key things in a workgroup is flexibility. Since all of our human rights are interrelated and interdependent, there will naturally be some overlap in workgroups. In the compilation of reports, lobbying at home and in Geneva the workgroup shares information and sometimes events, side-events or reports.

Each workgroup should submit at least one stakeholder report. The workgroup may decide to submit as many reports as it wants, and coordination makes certain that information is not duplicated. There may be members of workgroups who are interested in participating, and want to stay informed, but are not able to write a submission. There may be individuals/organizations who would prefer to sign onto, or endorse, another groups report instead of, or in addition to, submitting their own.

Each workgroup has two co-chairs, who will be responsible for facilitating meetings and scheduling meetings. Some workgroups may be larger than others, and the group and its co-chairs may decide to break up into issue areas for purposes of writing submissions one-pagers etc. or even for purposes of meetings.

There may be members of workgroups who have much experience in international mechanisms, and there may be those groups/individuals who are new to the process. The workgroup can function to assist those new to the process by providing information on how the process works.

Can I belong to more than one workgroup?

You may belong to as many workgroups as you desire, and many people/organizations choose more than one group. You may decide to be principally involved in one or two groups (active writing of reports or one-pagers) and less actively in others.

Does the entire workgroup go to Geneva?

Anyone who has the desire and funding can participate in the Geneva review. Those members who are not able to go to Geneva can also have meaningful participation through their workgroups, by being in contact with those of the group who are in Geneva. Workgroup members who do not travel to Geneva may be of great help to the workgroup in disseminating information about the UPR review while it is taking place; to increase the public awareness here at home while the process is ongoing. Blogging, press releases, tweets and Facebook posts can be done by all in the workgroup, whether or not they are in Geneva.

Is there work to be done after Geneva?

A very large part of the UPR work is done here at home. There will be many ways to participate in this work on a national, state and local level. Workgroups can have representative set meetings with other countries, establish email communications, set up and/or attend US Government consultations, and participate in public awareness and education here at home.

How much time will it take?

This depends upon your level of participation in the workgroup. If you are actively submitting a report or holding meetings it will take more time than if you are simply joining the group to keep up on what is happening in your issue area. The co-chairs will allow you to select a level of participation that works for you or your organization.

49 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

All Eyes on U.S. as New Administration Considers Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Human Rights Recommendations The United States’ response to its human rights obligations is front and center this week.

On March 4, 2021, the U.S. Government released its official response to the UPR Report developed in November 2020, following the Universal Periodic Review of the US. In part, the response states: "Th

bottom of page